5.0 · 624 reviews · Jim Blackburn · NMLS #1072866
Equal Housing Lender
(954) 993-1625
See My Options 60-sec match · no credit pull
Attorney & Lawyer Mortgages

Attorney mortgage from a lender who reads BigLaw associate W-2 + Cravath scale bonus, equity partner K-1 partnership distribution, non-equity (income) partner elevated W-2, solo practitioner Schedule C, plaintiff contingency lumpy income, and in-house counsel W-2 + RSU as one income picture.

Working U.S. attorneys carry the widest income variance of any professional services discipline — from BigLaw first-year associates at $225K starting on Cravath scale to AmLaw 100 equity partners at $5M–$10M+ annual partnership distributions to plaintiff contingency partners managing lumpy multi-million-dollar settlement cycles. Per BLS OOH May 2024 data, lawyers run a median wage of $135,740 with top 10% over $239,200. These numbers substantially understate working high-tier attorneys: BigLaw associates at AmLaw 100 firms including Cravath Swaine & Moore, Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, Sullivan & Cromwell, Davis Polk & Wardwell, Skadden Arps, Latham & Watkins, Kirkland & Ellis, Sidley Austin, Jones Day, Gibson Dunn, and Paul Weiss earn $225K–$435K W-2 (Cravath scale starting through 7th-year senior associate) plus annual bonuses $20K–$140K; non-equity (income) partners earn $400K–$1M elevated W-2; equity partners at top BigLaw firms earn $1M–$10M+ through K-1 partnership distributions from Form 1065 partnership returns with "eat what you kill," "lockstep," or "modified lockstep" compensation systems; Florida regional firm partners at Akerman, Greenberg Traurig (founded Miami), Holland & Knight, Shutts & Bowen, Gunster, Carlton Fields, and Stearns Weaver Miller earn $400K–$2M; solo practitioners and boutique partners earn $200K–$1M+ Schedule C; plaintiff contingency partners at firms including Morgan & Morgan and other Florida plaintiff firms earn $200K–$5M+ with highly lumpy income cycles tied to settlement timing; in-house counsel and General Counsel at public companies earn $250K–$2M+ combining elevated W-2 base with substantial RSU stock vesting. The qualifying mechanic that matters: aggregating BigLaw associate W-2 base + Cravath-scale bonus under B3-3.1-01, equity partner K-1 partnership distributions under B3-3.4-02, solo Schedule C + Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks under B3-3.3-02, plaintiff lumpy income with 24-month averaging or asset-depletion alternative, and in-house counsel RSU vesting under B3-3.1-09 — produces the actual income picture working attorneys carry, not the base-salary or recent-year-only number that generalist lenders sometimes substitute.

Broker NMLS #1072866 · Specialist in BigLaw associate W-2 + Cravath scale bonus, equity partner K-1 partnership distribution, non-equity (income) partner elevated W-2, solo practitioner Schedule C, plaintiff contingency lumpy income, and in-house counsel W-2 + RSU for attorney mortgages
Attorney working on legal matter at law firm office
$225K-$10M+
Working attorney income range from BigLaw first-year associate ($225K Cravath scale starting) through senior associate and non-equity partner to equity partner at AmLaw 100 firm ($1M-$10M+) to plaintiff partner ($200K-$5M+) and in-house counsel ($250K-$2M+)
Cravath scale
Industry-standard BigLaw associate compensation lockstep across years (1st-year $225K, 7th-year ~$415K base in 2024) plus annual bonus $20K-$140K depending on class year, established by Cravath Swaine & Moore
K-1 partner
Equity partners receive K-1 partnership distributions from Form 1065 partnership returns rather than W-2 wages; compensation systems vary across "eat what you kill," "lockstep," or "modified lockstep" frameworks at different firms
Legal = SSTB
Legal services is a Specified Service Trade or Business (SSTB) under IRC Section 199A, meaning the 20% QBI deduction phases out at higher income (2024 thresholds: $383,900 joint, $241,950 single, fully phased out higher)
Attorney reviewing case documents

Stairway Mortgage qualifies working U.S. attorneys on the full income picture — BigLaw associate W-2 base salary on the Cravath scale (industry-standard lockstep across associate years from $225K first-year through approximately $415K seventh-year in 2024) plus annual bonus ($20K-$140K depending on class year and firm performance) plus possible special bonuses and clerkship bonuses; non-equity (income) partner elevated W-2 at $400K-$1M during the transition to equity track; equity partner K-1 partnership distribution from Form 1065 partnership return at AmLaw 100/200 firms including Cravath Swaine & Moore, Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, Sullivan & Cromwell, Davis Polk & Wardwell, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Latham & Watkins, Kirkland & Ellis, Sidley Austin, Jones Day, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Weil Gotshal & Manges, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, and Debevoise & Plimpton, plus Florida regional firm partners at Akerman, Greenberg Traurig, Holland & Knight, Shutts & Bowen, Gunster, Carlton Fields, Stearns Weaver Miller, and other Florida firms with established Florida Bar standing; boutique law firm partner equity at smaller specialty firms structured as partnerships, S-corps, or LLCs taxed as partnerships; solo practitioner Schedule C 1099 income with substantial deductions for office, malpractice insurance, bar dues, CLE (continuing legal education), and legal research platform fees; plaintiff/contingency-fee partner income at firms including Morgan & Morgan and other Florida plaintiff firms with highly lumpy income tied to settlement and verdict timing; in-house counsel and General Counsel at public companies (S&P 500 and broader public equity universe) with W-2 base + bonus + RSU stock vesting structures; under Fannie Mae B3-3.1-01 variable income with 24-month average for W-2 components, B3-3.4-02 partnership/S-corp analysis for partner K-1, B3-3.3-02 Schedule C self-employed with Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks for solo practitioners, and B3-3.1-09 other sources of income for in-house counsel RSU vesting. A first-year associate at $225K Cravath scale, a fifth-year associate at $345K, a senior associate at $415K, a non-equity (income) partner at $650K, an equity partner at $2M+ K-1, a solo practitioner at $300K Schedule C, a plaintiff contingency partner with lumpy multi-million-dollar income, and a public company General Counsel at $750K W-2 + $400K RSU each get qualified using methods that fit their actual structure. Legal services is a Specified Service Trade or Business (SSTB) under IRC Section 199A — partners and solo practitioners face QBI deduction phase-out at higher income. Or skip ahead: browse every loan program, run numbers on 100+ mortgage calculators, or check today's rates. For the parent hub and other professional services paths, see our professional services mortgage hub.

01 · Attorney mortgage at a glance

Key facts every attorney should know before applying for a mortgage.

Cravath scale

The BigLaw associate compensation lockstep is industry-standard across AmLaw 100 firms. Established by Cravath Swaine & Moore and matched by peer firms, the scale runs $225K first-year through approximately $415K seventh-year in 2024, with annual bonuses $20K-$140K depending on class year. Qualifies under Fannie Mae B3-3.1-01 as variable income with 24-month average.

Partner K-1

Equity partners receive K-1 partnership distributions from Form 1065 partnership returns rather than W-2 wages. Compensation systems vary across "eat what you kill," "lockstep," and "modified lockstep" frameworks. Under B3-3.4-02, partner K-1 income qualifies with 2-year averaging plus Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks at the partnership level.

Legal IS SSTB

Legal services is classified as Specified Service Trade or Business (SSTB) under IRC Section 199A. Equity partners and solo practitioners face QBI deduction phase-out at higher income (2024 thresholds: $383,900 joint, $241,950 single, fully phased out at $483,900 joint and $341,950 single). Unfavorable QBI treatment vs non-SSTB professions.

Bar standing

Active bar standing is the foundational licensure requirement. The Florida Bar regulates Florida attorneys; American Bar Association (ABA) provides national-level professional standards. For mortgage qualifying, current active bar standing with no material disciplinary issues is verified through state bar records.

02 · Where you are in your legal career

Attorney mortgage solutions for every career stage.

The legal profession has the widest income variance of any professional services discipline. A first-year BigLaw associate at $225K has a fundamentally different qualifying picture than a senior associate at $415K, a non-equity (income) partner at $650K, an equity partner at $2M+ K-1, a solo practitioner with high Schedule C deductions, a plaintiff contingency partner with lumpy multi-million-dollar income, or an in-house General Counsel at public company with W-2 + RSU.

01

Junior associate (Years 1–3)

"BigLaw or large-firm junior associate at Cravath, Wachtell, Sullivan & Cromwell, Davis Polk, Skadden, Latham, Kirkland, Sidley, Jones Day, Gibson Dunn, or Florida regional firm. W-2 on Cravath scale lockstep with annual bonus."

  • Annual income $225K-$310K W-2 + bonus (Cravath scale 1st-3rd year)
  • 2-year+ W-2 history may build during these years
  • No equity until partnership consideration (typically Year 7-10)
  • Conventional Conforming or Jumbo W-2
See junior associate mechanics
02

Senior associate / Counsel

"Senior associate (Years 4-8) or Of Counsel at AmLaw 100/200 firm. W-2 on Cravath scale through senior years with elevated bonuses. Approaching partnership consideration window."

  • Annual income $325K-$555K W-2 + bonus (Cravath scale Years 4-7)
  • Special bonuses possible for top performers
  • Lateral movement opportunity to peer firms
  • Conventional Jumbo W-2
See senior associate mechanics
03

Non-equity (income) partner

"Non-equity or "income" partner at large firm receiving elevated W-2 during transition to equity partner consideration. Title of "partner" but compensation structure remains W-2 (no K-1 distribution yet)."

  • Annual income $400K-$1M elevated W-2
  • 2-year+ W-2 history at non-equity tier supports qualifying
  • Bonus structure typically tied to firm profitability metrics
  • Conventional Jumbo W-2
See non-equity partner mechanics
04

Equity partner (K-1)

"Equity partner at AmLaw 100/200 firm or Florida regional firm receiving K-1 partnership distribution from Form 1065. "Eat what you kill," "lockstep," or "modified lockstep" compensation system depending on firm."

  • Annual income $1M-$10M+ K-1 partnership distribution
  • Capital contribution required (typically $250K-$2M+)
  • Origination and working credits affect comp
  • Conventional Jumbo K-1 with B3-3.4-02
See equity partner mechanics
05

Solo / Plaintiff / In-house

"Solo practitioner with Schedule C 1099 income, plaintiff contingency partner with lumpy settlement-driven income, OR in-house counsel / General Counsel at public company with W-2 + RSU structure similar to corporate executive."

  • Solo: $150K-$1M+ Schedule C with Form 1084 addbacks
  • Plaintiff: $200K-$5M+ lumpy with 2-year average smoothing
  • In-house: $250K-$2M+ W-2 + RSU vesting
  • Multiple loan program options depending on structure
See solo/plaintiff/in-house mechanics
03 · The qualification mechanics

How we calculate qualifying income for your attorney mortgage.

Four methods cover almost every attorney file we’ve closed. The right method depends on your career stage (associate vs partner vs solo vs in-house), whether you have equity vs non-equity (income) partner status, whether you have made S-corp or LLC election as a solo practitioner, and whether you carry contingency-fee plaintiff lumpy income.

Method 1 — BigLaw associate W-2 + Cravath scale bonus (the associate default)

The dominant pattern for working BigLaw associates at AmLaw 100/200 firms. Under Fannie Mae B3-3.1-01, W-2 base salary on the industry-standard Cravath scale lockstep plus annual bonus qualifies as variable income with 24-month average. The Cravath scale runs $225K first-year, $235K second-year, $260K third-year, $310K fourth-year, $345K fifth-year, $370K sixth-year, and approximately $415K seventh-year associate base in 2024, matched across peer AmLaw 100 firms (Wachtell, Sullivan & Cromwell, Davis Polk, Skadden, Latham, Kirkland & Ellis, Sidley, Jones Day, Gibson Dunn, Paul Weiss, Simpson Thacher, Weil Gotshal, Cleary Gottlieb, Debevoise, Quinn Emanuel). Annual bonuses depend on class year, firm performance, and individual evaluation, commonly $20K-$140K with special bonuses occasionally announced firm-wide. We document the Cravath scale position with HR compensation letter showing class year, base, and bonus history.

Method 2 — Equity partner K-1 partnership distribution (the partner default)

For equity partners at AmLaw 100/200 firms or Florida regional firms receiving K-1 partnership distributions from Form 1065 partnership returns. Under Fannie Mae B3-3.4-02, partner K-1 income qualifies with 2-year averaging plus Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks at the partnership level. Compensation systems vary across "eat what you kill" (origination + working credits drive individual comp), "lockstep" (tenure-based fixed share structure), and "modified lockstep" (hybrid combining tenure base with performance variation). Capital contribution required for equity partnership (typically $250K-$2M+ depending on firm and tier). Origination credits and working credits affect annual comp allocation. We document the partnership agreement, capital account status, and recent K-1s.

Method 3 — Solo practitioner / boutique partner Schedule C + Form 1084 (the solo method)

For solo practitioners with Schedule C 1099 income or boutique partners at smaller specialty firms structured as S-corps or LLCs. Under Fannie Mae B3-3.3-02, Schedule C 1099 income qualifies with 24-month averaging plus Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks. Solo attorney Schedule C deductions commonly include office rent (or home office allocation), malpractice insurance (typically $5K-$25K annually depending on practice area), Florida Bar dues and CLE (continuing legal education) fees, legal research platform fees (Westlaw, LexisNexis, Bloomberg Law typically $200-$800/month), local counsel fees for multi-state matters, court filing fees, expert witness retainers, and staff salaries. For top solo practitioners at $400K+ annual net income, S-corp election produces meaningful self-employment tax savings under IRC Section 1361.

Method 4 — In-house counsel W-2 + RSU + bonus (the in-house method)

For in-house counsel, Deputy General Counsel, and General Counsel at public companies. Under Fannie Mae B3-3.1-01, in-house counsel W-2 base salary plus annual cash bonus (typically 25-100% of base for senior in-house roles) plus RSU stock compensation aggregates as variable income with 24-month average. RSU vesting qualifies additionally under B3-3.1-09 with continuing vesting schedule documentation. General Counsel roles at S&P 500 companies commonly $500K-$2M+ total comp combining base + bonus + RSU. The in-house counsel comp structure parallels corporate executive comp covered separately in our Corporate Executives hub.

04 · What generalist underwriting misses

The income most lenders refuse to count on an attorney file.

Six income facts that show up consistently on working attorney files and that generalist lenders typically either ignore, mis-categorize, or refuse to apply correctly. Each one is documentable; the lender just has to read the attorney channel-specific multi-source structure properly.

A

Cravath scale W-2 + bonus lockstep

BigLaw associate compensation runs the industry-standard Cravath scale lockstep ($225K first-year through approximately $415K seventh-year in 2024) plus annual bonus ($20K-$140K typical) plus possible special bonuses and clerkship bonuses. Under B3-3.1-01, total W-2 with 24-month average. Generalist underwriters sometimes treat the bonus as "discretionary" without recognizing the multi-year continuity of Cravath scale bonus matching across AmLaw 100 firms.

B

Equity partner K-1 partnership distribution

Equity partners receive K-1 distributions from Form 1065 partnership returns — not W-2 wages. Annual K-1 income at AmLaw 100 equity partners commonly $1M-$5M with elite partners $5M-$10M+. Under B3-3.4-02, K-1 qualifies with 2-year average plus Form 1084 partnership-level cash-flow addbacks for depreciation, amortization, and other non-cash deductions at the firm level.

C

Non-equity (income) partner elevated W-2

Non-equity (income) partners hold the title of "partner" but receive W-2 wages rather than K-1 distributions during the transition to equity partner consideration. Annual non-equity partner W-2 commonly $400K-$1M combining elevated base with performance bonus tied to firm profitability metrics. Under B3-3.1-01, the non-equity partner W-2 qualifies as variable income with 24-month average. Generalist underwriters sometimes misread the partner title and incorrectly apply B3-3.4-02 partnership analysis instead of W-2 B3-3.1-01.

D

Plaintiff/contingency lumpy income cycle

Plaintiff contingency-fee attorneys at firms like Morgan & Morgan and other Florida plaintiff firms manage highly lumpy income tied to settlement and verdict timing. A plaintiff partner might have a $300K base year followed by a $4M settlement year. Under B3-3.4-02 (if partnership) or B3-3.3-02 (if solo Schedule C), the 24-month average smooths cycles partially but extreme lumpiness may require Asset-Depletion Non-QM or P&L Statement Only Non-QM alternatives.

E

In-house counsel RSU at public companies

In-house counsel, Deputy General Counsel, and General Counsel at S&P 500 and broader public companies commonly receive substantial RSU stock compensation. General Counsel RSU at public companies commonly $200K-$1M+ annually from LTIP grants. Under B3-3.1-09, RSU vesting qualifies with continuing vesting schedule documentation. Generalist underwriters sometimes refuse RSU as "speculative future stock" without proper aggregation under B3-3.1-09.

F

Origination + working credits at partnership comp

At "eat what you kill" and "modified lockstep" firms, partner compensation allocation tracks origination credits (for business brought to the firm) and working credits (for billable hours and effective leverage). For an equity partner with substantial origination credits from key clients producing high billable work, the credit allocation can substantially elevate the partner’s K-1 share above lockstep peers. We document the partnership agreement’s allocation methodology and multi-year credit history to support continuing K-1 narrative.

05 · Match the program to your attorney situation

Which loan program fits your attorney mortgage situation.

Seven loan-program categories cover essentially every attorney file we’ve closed. The mix tilts heavily toward Conventional Conforming and Jumbo with rigorous channel-specific documentation (B3-3.1-01 W-2 for associates and non-equity partners, B3-3.4-02 K-1 for equity partners, B3-3.3-02 Schedule C for solo, B3-3.1-09 RSU for in-house at public companies). Bank Statement and Asset-Depletion Non-QM serve specialty cases.

Conventional Conforming W-2 (associate)

  • BigLaw associates with Cravath scale W-2 + bonus
  • B3-3.1-01 variable income with 24-month average
  • Loan limits to $766,550 (FL) 2024-25
Best for: BigLaw Years 1-3

Conventional Jumbo W-2 (senior associate / non-equity)

  • Senior associates and non-equity partners at $400K+ W-2
  • B3-3.1-01 with multi-year bonus continuity
  • Loan amounts above conforming to $2M+
Best for: Senior associate / income partner

Conventional Jumbo K-1 (equity partner)

  • Equity partners at AmLaw 100/200 and Florida regional firms
  • B3-3.4-02 with partnership-level Form 1084 addbacks
  • Loan amounts to $3M+ depending on K-1 history
Best for: Equity partner

S-Corp / LLC Self-Employed (boutique partner)

  • Boutique law firm partners with S-corp or LLC election
  • W-2 reasonable comp + K-1 distributions under B3-3.4-02
  • Form 1084 addbacks at S-corp or LLC partnership level
Best for: Boutique partner

Schedule C + Form 1084 (solo practitioner)

  • Solo practitioners with substantial Schedule C deductions
  • B3-3.3-02 with Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks
  • Conventional Conforming or Jumbo depending on income
Best for: Solo practitioner

Asset-Depletion Non-QM (post-settlement plaintiff)

  • Plaintiff contingency partners post-big-settlement
  • Liquid assets amortized over 360 months as implied income
  • Useful when recent settlement produces lumpy reserves
Best for: Post-settlement plaintiff

In-house counsel W-2 + RSU (public company GC)

  • In-house counsel at S&P 500 / public companies
  • B3-3.1-01 W-2 + B3-3.1-09 RSU vesting aggregation
  • Conventional Jumbo with multi-source documentation
Best for: In-house / General Counsel
06 · Why this mortgage requires specialty expertise

The attorney mortgage in context: 6 forces shaping how lawyers qualify.

Attorney mortgage qualifying sits at the intersection of AmLaw 100/200 ranking and revenue tiers, ongoing law firm M&A consolidation activity, the Cravath scale wage competition that drives BigLaw associate comp, ALSP (Alternative Legal Service Providers) disruption of traditional firm work, the lateral partner movements that reshape firm balance sheets, and the in-house counsel migration trend pulling senior attorneys from BigLaw partnership to public company General Counsel roles. Each force shapes what a working attorney’s qualifying picture looks like.

Force 1 — AmLaw 100/200 ranking and revenue tiers

The AmLaw 100 and AmLaw 200 ranking (published annually by The American Lawyer magazine) tracks U.S. law firm gross revenue, profits per partner (PPP), and revenue per lawyer (RPL). The top AmLaw 100 firms commonly exceed $1B+ in annual gross revenue with average profits per equity partner exceeding $5M at the elite tier. Firms including Wachtell Lipton (highest PPP), Sullivan & Cromwell, Cravath, Davis Polk, Paul Weiss, Kirkland & Ellis (largest by revenue at over $7B), Latham & Watkins, and Skadden anchor the elite tier. The mortgage implication: equity partners at AmLaw 100 elite-tier firms commonly carry K-1 income substantially exceeding average partner comp at lower-tier firms.

Force 2 — Law firm M&A consolidation

Law firm M&A activity has continued through significant mergers and combinations. The proposed Allen & Overy / Shearman & Sterling merger (closed May 2024 as A&O Shearman) is one of the largest BigLaw mergers in history. Other recent consolidation activity includes Holland & Knight expanding through acquisitions, the merger of Bryan Cave with BCLP, and various boutique combinations. The mortgage implication: equity partners at merging firms may experience compensation structure changes through integration, requiring documentation continuity through the new combined firm’s partnership agreement.

Force 3 — Cravath scale wage competition

The Cravath scale (industry-standard BigLaw associate compensation lockstep) has experienced substantial wage inflation over the past 5 years. The 2024 Cravath scale base salary ($225K first-year through approximately $415K seventh-year) represents significant elevation from 2019 levels ($190K first-year through $340K seventh-year). Annual bonus structures have similarly elevated. The mortgage implication: BigLaw associates have seen substantial year-over-year income growth driving stronger qualifying capacity, with the 24-month average reflecting the trajectory.

Force 4 — ALSP (Alternative Legal Service Providers)

Alternative Legal Service Providers including Big 4 accounting firm legal arms (Deloitte Legal, KPMG Law, EY Law, PwC Legal Services), legal process outsourcing firms (LPO), and managed legal services have continued to expand market share for commoditized legal work, putting pricing pressure on traditional BigLaw billable-hour models. The mortgage implication: ALSP competition affects firm-level economics over time but doesn’t directly affect individual attorney qualifying mechanics — we document current employment and comp structure.

Force 5 — Lateral partner movements

The lateral partner market has been active with substantial movement of equity partners between AmLaw 100 firms driven by guarantee packages, practice fit, and compensation considerations. Industry data from Law.com and the legal recruiter community indicates sustained lateral activity at the senior partner level. The mortgage implication: lateral partners moving between firms commonly receive guarantee packages structured similarly to wirehouse forgivable loan recruiting, requiring documentation through the new firm’s partnership agreement and recruiting note structure.

Force 6 — In-house counsel migration trend

The migration of senior attorneys from BigLaw partnership to in-house General Counsel roles at public companies has continued as a multi-decade trend. In-house roles at S&P 500 and broader public equity universe offer comp packages combining elevated base + bonus + RSU that often compete with partnership distributions at lower-tier AmLaw 200 firms. The mortgage implication: attorneys transitioning from partnership K-1 to in-house W-2 + RSU experience income structure shifts requiring documentation across the transition under combined B3-3.4-02 (prior K-1) and B3-3.1-01 + B3-3.1-09 (new W-2 + RSU) analysis.

07 · The mortgage shifts as your legal career develops

Attorney mortgage by career stage.

A timeline view of how the right mortgage program changes as you progress from junior associate through senior associate to non-equity partner, equity partner, solo practice, plaintiff bar, or in-house counsel roles.

Years 1–3

Junior associate

Comp profile: $225K-$310K W-2 + bonus on Cravath scale 1st-3rd year. Limited 2-year history may be building. Dominant qualifying method: Conventional Conforming W-2 with B3-3.1-01. Common purchase: $500K-$800K primary residence. Watch-out: Florida Bar standing active; clerkship bonus documented if applicable; class year and firm verified through HR.

Years 4–8

Senior associate / Counsel

Comp profile: $325K-$555K W-2 + bonus on Cravath scale Years 4-7. Special bonuses possible. Dominant qualifying method: Conventional Jumbo W-2 with B3-3.1-01 24-month average including bonus continuity. Common purchase: $800K-$1.4M primary residence. Watch-out: Lateral movement opportunities approaching partnership consideration window; lateral guarantee package documentation if applicable.

Partner track / equity

Non-equity (income) partner / Equity partner

Comp profile: Non-equity $400K-$1M W-2 OR equity partner $1M-$10M+ K-1 partnership distribution. Dominant qualifying method: Conventional Jumbo W-2 (non-equity) OR Conventional Jumbo K-1 with B3-3.4-02 (equity). Common purchase: $1.2M-$3M+ primary residence. Watch-out: Equity partner transition requires capital contribution; documentation of partnership agreement and capital account status.

Solo / Plaintiff / In-house

Solo practitioner / Plaintiff partner / In-house counsel

Comp profile: Solo $150K-$1M+ Schedule C / Plaintiff $200K-$5M+ lumpy / In-house $250K-$2M+ W-2 + RSU. Dominant qualifying method: Schedule C + Form 1084 (solo) OR Asset-Depletion Non-QM (plaintiff post-settlement) OR Conventional Jumbo with B3-3.1-01 + B3-3.1-09 (in-house). Common purchase: $1M-$3M+ depending on structure. Watch-out: Plaintiff lumpy cycle may require P&L Statement Only Non-QM; in-house RSU vesting documented for continuing income.

08 · What attorneys say

What attorneys say about their Stairway mortgage.

Names abbreviated for client privacy. Firm details anonymized. Numbers are real.

Jonathan B., senior associate at AmLaw 100 firm
"Sixth-year senior associate at an AmLaw 100 firm for 6 years on the Cravath scale. W-2 base salary $370K (sixth-year Cravath scale base) plus annual bonus $115K (above-market bonus tied to billable hour qualification at 2,200+ hours and strong evaluation) plus special bonus $25K (firm-wide announcement that year). Total W-2 averaging $485K over the 2-year period. The first lender pulled my W-2 and applied 24-month average treatment but classified the annual bonus as ‘discretionary not stable for jumbo qualifying,’ refused the special bonus as ‘non-recurring one-time,’ and offered me $785K based on base salary plus modest bonus floor at $410K qualifying. Jim’s team documented the Cravath scale class year with HR letter showing 6-year continuous AmLaw 100 employment, the bonus history showing multi-year continuity tied to billable qualification metrics, and the special bonus history showing firm-wide announcements. $1.25M close Conventional Jumbo on a Coral Springs home in 39 days."
Jonathan B.
AmLaw 100 senior associate · Coral Springs
Patricia W., equity partner at AmLaw 100 firm with K-1 income
"Equity partner at an AmLaw 100 firm for 8 years after making partner from the senior associate ranks. K-1 partnership distribution averaging $2.85M over the 2-year period from Form 1065 partnership return covering both base lockstep share and origination credit allocation (substantial origination from key institutional clients). Capital account at the firm approximately $1.6M from accumulated capital contribution and retained partnership equity. Plus elevated Florida Bar standing and active leadership in two ABA practice section committees. The first lender saw the K-1 partnership distribution structure and called the origination credit component ‘variable performance-based not stable,’ refused to apply Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks at the partnership level to recover firm-level depreciation and amortization, and offered me $1.45M Conventional Jumbo based on conservative K-1 treatment alone. Jim’s team documented the partnership agreement with the credit allocation methodology, the multi-year origination credit history showing 5-year continuity with the key institutional clients, the Form 1065 partnership returns with Schedule K-1 and Schedule L showing firm-level non-cash deductions for Form 1084 addback recovery, and the capital account history. $2.65M close Conventional Super-Jumbo on a Boca Raton home in 46 days."
Patricia W.
AmLaw 100 equity partner · Boca Raton
Marcus J., solo practitioner Florida attorney with substantial Schedule C deductions
"Solo practitioner Florida attorney for 12 years in commercial litigation practice. Annual Schedule C 1099 income averaging $545K over the 2-year period with substantial deductions totaling approximately $185K covering office rent ($42K), malpractice insurance ($18K), Florida Bar dues and CLE ($3.5K), Westlaw and Bloomberg Law research platform subscriptions ($8.4K combined), one paralegal salary plus benefits ($75K), local counsel fees for multi-state matters ($12K), court filing and expert witness fees ($14K), and home office allocation ($12K). Schedule C net income $360K. S-corp election made 4 years ago: W-2 reasonable comp $185K + K-1 distributions averaging $175K. The first lender pulled the tax returns showing substantial Schedule C deductions and classified the solo practitioner income as ‘variable self-employed not stable for jumbo,’ refused to apply Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks to recover non-cash components from the S-corp 1120-S, and offered me $785K based on S-corp W-2 alone. Jim’s team applied Form 1084 addbacks recovering depreciation on office equipment plus the home office expense allocation at the S-corp level under B3-3.4-02, documented the Florida Bar standing through Bar records, and ran the multi-year solo practice history showing consistent income across the 12-year practice. $1.45M close Conventional Jumbo on a Plantation home in 43 days."
Marcus J.
Solo practitioner Florida attorney · Plantation
09 · Attorney mortgage FAQs

Attorney mortgage questions, answered.

01
I’m a BigLaw associate on Cravath scale. How does my W-2 + bonus qualify?
BigLaw associate W-2 base salary plus annual bonus qualifies under Fannie Mae B3-3.1-01 as variable income with 24-month average. The Cravath scale lockstep ($225K-$415K base across associate years in 2024) plus bonus ($20K-$140K typical) aggregates into total W-2. We document the Cravath scale position with HR compensation letter showing class year, base, and bonus history. The bonus is treated as continuing variable income with multi-year continuity at AmLaw 100 firms.
02
I’m an equity partner receiving K-1 distributions. How does that count?
Equity partner K-1 partnership distributions from Form 1065 partnership returns qualify under Fannie Mae B3-3.4-02 with 2-year averaging plus Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks at the partnership level. We document the partnership agreement, capital account status, K-1s for the 2-year period, and partnership Form 1065 with Schedule L for cash-flow addback analysis.
03
I’m a non-equity (income) partner. How is that different from equity partner?
Non-equity (income) partners hold the title of "partner" but receive W-2 wages rather than K-1 partnership distributions. The non-equity partner W-2 commonly $400K-$1M qualifies under B3-3.1-01 as variable income, similar to senior associate qualifying. Generalist underwriters sometimes misread the partner title and incorrectly apply B3-3.4-02 partnership analysis — we ensure proper W-2 classification.
04
I’m a solo practitioner with substantial Schedule C deductions. How does qualifying work?
Under Fannie Mae B3-3.3-02, solo practitioner Schedule C income qualifies with 24-month averaging plus Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks for non-cash deductions. Solo attorney deductions for office rent, malpractice insurance, Florida Bar dues and CLE, legal research platforms (Westlaw, LexisNexis, Bloomberg Law), staff salaries, and court filing fees flow through Schedule C with Form 1084 systematically recovering non-cash components.
05
I’m a plaintiff/contingency-fee partner with lumpy settlement income. How is that treated?
Plaintiff contingency-fee income at firms like Morgan & Morgan or other Florida plaintiff firms is highly lumpy tied to settlement and verdict timing. The 24-month average under B3-3.4-02 (partnership) or B3-3.3-02 (solo) smooths cycles partially. For attorneys with extreme lumpiness, alternatives include Asset-Depletion Non-QM (post-settlement liquid reserves amortized over 360 months) or P&L Statement Only Non-QM (CPA-prepared YTD profit & loss when recent performance substantially exceeds historical average).
06
I’m in-house counsel at a public company with W-2 + RSU. How does qualifying work?
In-house counsel W-2 base + bonus aggregates under B3-3.1-01; RSU stock vesting from LTIP grants aggregates additionally under B3-3.1-09 with continuing vesting schedule. General Counsel at S&P 500 commonly $500K-$2M+ across components. Structure parallels corporate executive comp covered on our Corporate Executives hub.
07
What documentation do I need for an attorney mortgage?
Depends on channel. BigLaw associate / non-equity partner: two W-2s, current pay stubs, HR compensation letter documenting Cravath scale class year and bonus history. Equity partner: Form 1065 partnership returns with K-1s for 2 years, Schedule L, partnership agreement, capital account history. Solo practitioner: two complete 1040s with Schedule C, 1099-NECs, business bank statements. Plaintiff contingency: same as solo plus possible CPA-prepared P&L for recent performance. In-house: W-2 + LTIP grant documentation + brokerage statements showing RSU vest. Florida Bar standing verification through Bar records in all cases.
08
My capital contribution to make equity partner was substantial. How does that affect qualifying?
Capital contribution to equity partnership (typically $250K-$2M+ depending on firm and tier) creates capital account at the firm. The capital contribution may have been funded through firm-arranged loans or personal funds. We document the capital contribution structure and capital account status. The capital account doesn’t directly qualify income but supports balance sheet narrative for Jumbo qualifying.
09
I’m considering a lateral move to another AmLaw 100 firm. How should I time my mortgage?
Lateral partner moves create documentation complexity. Lateral guarantee packages (commonly 1.5x-3x trailing 12-month K-1 paid as multi-year vesting incentive) require documentation of the new firm’s partnership agreement and recruiting note structure. Strategic options: (1) close mortgage BEFORE the lateral move using established prior-firm K-1 history; (2) wait 12-24 months post-move to establish new firm history; (3) document the lateral guarantee package for continuing income narrative at the new firm.
10
Are mortgage rates higher for attorneys?
No — mortgage rates for attorneys are the same as for any other borrower at the same credit profile, loan amount, and program selection. BigLaw W-2 associates and equity partner K-1 both achieve strong Conventional Conforming and Jumbo outcomes at standard pricing when proper channel-specific documentation supports the file.
11
My annual bonus varies. How does 24-month averaging treat that?
Under B3-3.1-01, the 24-month average smooths annual bonus variation. For BigLaw associates with Cravath scale bonus history showing multi-year continuity, the 2-year average produces representative qualifying. For attorneys with substantially elevated recent bonuses vs prior years, the average may understate current capacity — alternatives include waiting for stronger recent quarters to roll into the average or documenting the bonus trajectory through HR letter.
12
My firm has "eat what you kill" comp. How does that affect K-1 qualifying?
"Eat what you kill" firms allocate partner K-1 distributions based on origination credits (business brought to firm) and working credits (billable hours). Under B3-3.4-02, the K-1 history qualifies with 2-year average. We document the partnership agreement’s allocation methodology and multi-year credit history to support continuing K-1 narrative through the variable allocation system.
13
My spouse is also an attorney. How does that affect us?
Two-attorney households produce strong joint qualifying when both spouses have established 2-year histories. Both files combine as co-borrowers with full channel-appropriate analysis (B3-3.1-01 for W-2 associates, B3-3.4-02 for partner K-1, B3-3.3-02 for solo). Combined household income from two AmLaw 100 attorneys commonly $700K-$2M+ supports $1.5M-$3M+ qualifying.
14
How does IRC Section 199A QBI affect me as an attorney?
Legal services is classified as Specified Service Trade or Business (SSTB) under IRC Section 199A. Equity partners and solo practitioners face QBI deduction phase-out at higher income (2024 thresholds: $383,900 joint, $241,950 single, fully phased out at $483,900 joint and $341,950 single). This is unfavorable vs non-SSTB professions but doesn’t affect mortgage qualifying directly — it affects after-tax income optimization. Coordinate with your CPA.
15
Why do generalist lenders sometimes refuse attorney files?
Six reasons: (1) BigLaw associate bonus classified as "discretionary not stable" without recognizing Cravath scale multi-year continuity; (2) non-equity (income) partner W-2 misclassified as partnership K-1 requiring B3-3.4-02 analysis; (3) equity partner K-1 lumpy partnership distribution undercounted without Form 1084 partnership-level addbacks; (4) solo practitioner Schedule C high deductions misread as profitability problem; (5) plaintiff contingency lumpy cycle treated as instability without proper averaging; (6) in-house counsel RSU refused as "speculative future stock." The income is all there and documentable — the file needs a broker who reads attorney channel-specific structure correctly.
16
My partner capital is funded by firm loan. How does that affect debt?
Partner capital contribution funded through firm-arranged loans creates a debt obligation that shows on credit reports. The firm loan typically carries below-market interest tied to the firm’s borrowing structure. Under standard underwriting, the firm loan payment is included in debt-to-income calculation. We coordinate documentation through the firm’s capital administration for accurate loan terms.
17
When should I make S-corp election as a solo practitioner?
Typically at $300K+ annual net Schedule C income for solo attorneys, S-corp election starts producing meaningful self-employment tax savings under IRC Section 1361. S-corp involves paying W-2 reasonable compensation (typically $150K-$250K for solo attorneys based on practice area and personal billings) and taking remaining net as K-1 distributions. Coordinate with your CPA. We model qualifying pre vs post election.
18
My firm just merged with another firm. How does that affect my qualifying?
Law firm M&A activity is common. Recent consolidation includes the A&O Shearman merger (May 2024), Holland & Knight expansion, BCLP, and others. We document the merger through HR/partnership letter confirming continuing employment or partnership status in the combined firm, the post-merger compensation structure, and any partnership integration terms. The continuing employment / partnership status supports qualifying through B3-3.1-01 or B3-3.4-02.
19
Can I use Asset-Depletion to qualify on settlement proceeds?
Yes — for plaintiff attorneys post-big-settlement, Asset-Depletion Non-QM qualifies on liquid assets amortized over 360 months as implied income. A $1M post-settlement liquid balance amortizes to roughly $2,800/month implied income. Useful when 24-month average doesn’t reflect recent settlement capacity. Pricing carries 0.5-1% rate premium vs Conventional.
20
Are there mortgage programs specifically designed for attorneys?
Some lenders offer "professional loan" or "doctor loan" programs that include attorneys with specific structures (low down payment, no PMI, deferred student loan treatment). These programs vary in availability and pricing. What matters most is finding a broker who understands attorney channel-specific qualifying: B3-3.1-01 Cravath scale W-2 + bonus, B3-3.4-02 partnership K-1, B3-3.3-02 solo Schedule C with Form 1084, and B3-3.1-09 in-house RSU vesting. Conventional Conforming and Jumbo done right outperforms specialty product chasing in most cases.
21
My Florida Bar standing has prior disciplinary disclosures. Does that affect my mortgage?
Material Florida Bar disciplinary actions can affect underwriting review. Minor issues (CLE non-compliance fees, trust account violations resolved without sanction) typically don’t affect qualifying. Material disclosures (suspension, public reprimand) may require underwriting explanation. We coordinate any necessary explanation. Active bar standing with current good standing is the key requirement.
22
I’m considering moving from BigLaw partnership to in-house General Counsel. How should I time my mortgage?
Channel transitions from partnership K-1 to in-house W-2 + RSU create new-employment underwriting where the new employer doesn’t yet have 2 years W-2 history. Strategic options: (1) close mortgage BEFORE the transition using established BigLaw K-1 history; (2) wait 12-24 months post-transition to establish in-house W-2; (3) co-borrower file with spouse income providing stability. The shift from K-1 to W-2 + RSU often produces strong combined qualifying once 2-year history establishes.
23
Can a clerkship bonus be counted?
Yes — clerkship bonuses paid by BigLaw firms for prior federal or state court clerkship qualify under B3-3.1-01 as W-2 income. Clerkship bonuses typically range $50K-$100K depending on clerkship level (district court vs circuit court vs Supreme Court). Documented through HR letter showing the clerkship bonus structure and payment terms.
24
When should I start the mortgage conversation relative to a home purchase?
Ideally 120-150 days before you intend to make an offer. Attorney files benefit from substantial runway because of channel-specific qualifying (W-2 vs K-1 vs Schedule C), multi-year partnership K-1 documentation for equity partners, Form 1084 cash-flow addback analysis at the partnership or S-corp level, RSU vesting analysis for in-house counsel, possible coordination with firm HR for compensation letter, and Florida Bar standing verification. For lateral partner moves or in-house transitions, additional runway helps coordinate the timing.
25
What HR or firm documentation should I request?
For BigLaw associates: HR compensation letter covering Cravath scale class year, base salary, annual bonus history, special bonus history, and continuing employment. For equity partners: partnership agreement, capital account statement, Form 1065 partnership returns with K-1s for 2 years, Schedule L for cash-flow addback analysis, partnership compensation methodology documentation. For solo practitioners: 1099-NECs, Schedule C with all worksheets, S-corp 1120-S if applicable, business bank statements. For in-house counsel: HR letter covering W-2 + bonus + RSU grant history, LTIP grant agreements with vesting schedules.
10 · Companion guides & calculators

More on attorney mortgages, channel-specific qualifying, and partnership K-1 analysis.

12 · What "right door first" looks like

Attorney mortgage, structured right.

Equity partner at an AmLaw 100 firm for 8 years after making partner from the senior associate ranks at the firm. Partner with substantial practice in corporate M&A and private equity transactional work serving institutional client base. K-1 partnership distribution averaging $2.85M over the 2-year period from Form 1065 partnership return covering both the base lockstep share (allocated according to the firm’s modified lockstep compensation methodology with tenure-based share weight) and the origination credit allocation (substantial origination from key institutional clients in the private equity space producing significant matter generation across the past 5 years). Capital account at the firm approximately $1.6M from accumulated capital contribution made at the time of partnership and retained partnership equity from undistributed firm profits. Plus active Florida Bar standing with no material disciplinary disclosures and active leadership role in two ABA practice section committees. The first lender saw the K-1 partnership distribution structure on the tax returns and the Form 1065 partnership return, called the origination credit allocation component "variable performance-based not stable for jumbo qualifying" despite the documented 5-year continuity, refused to apply Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks at the partnership level to recover firm-level depreciation and amortization for non-cash deductions, treated the K-1 income with conservative discounting, and offered the partner $1.45M Conventional Jumbo based on the conservative K-1 treatment alone. We pulled the two complete Form 1065 partnership returns with Schedule K-1s for the partner showing the full distribution including both lockstep base and origination credit components, the partnership agreement documenting the modified lockstep compensation methodology and the origination credit allocation framework, the partnership capital account statement showing the $1.6M capital account from initial capital contribution and retained partnership equity, the multi-year origination credit history showing the 5-year continuity of substantial credit allocation from the key institutional clients, Schedule L (balance sheet) from the partnership return for partnership-level Form 1084 cash-flow addback analysis recovering depreciation and amortization at the firm level, and the Florida Bar standing verification through Bar records. Applied Form 1084 cash-flow addbacks systematically at the partnership level recovering the firm-level non-cash deductions and ran the 24-month average under Fannie Mae B3-3.4-02 with multi-source documentation across the lockstep and origination credit components. Total qualifying income: approximately $2.45M. Approved at $2.65M Conventional Super-Jumbo for a Boca Raton home in 46 days. Equity partner K-1 partnership income with origination credit allocation and partnership-level Form 1084 cash-flow addback recovery is the standard equity partner qualifying pattern — the first lender just didn’t know how to read AmLaw 100 partnership K-1 structure with proper Form 1084 application.

House keys at closing
46-day close · Boca Raton, FL
Talk to an attorney mortgage specialist

Get an attorney mortgage from a lender who reads BigLaw associate W-2 + Cravath scale bonus, equity partner K-1 partnership distribution, non-equity (income) partner elevated W-2, solo practitioner Schedule C, plaintiff lumpy income, and in-house counsel W-2 + RSU as one file.

No application. No credit pull. A 20-minute conversation where we look at your BigLaw associate W-2 on Cravath scale if at Cravath, Wachtell, Sullivan & Cromwell, Davis Polk, Skadden, Latham, Kirkland, Sidley, Jones Day, Gibson Dunn, Paul Weiss, or other AmLaw 100/200 firm, your equity partner K-1 partnership distribution from Form 1065 if equity partner with capital account and origination credit allocation, your non-equity partner elevated W-2 if in the income partner tier, your solo practitioner Schedule C with substantial deductions if in solo practice, your plaintiff contingency lumpy income if at Morgan & Morgan or other Florida plaintiff firm, your in-house counsel W-2 + RSU + bonus if at public company General Counsel role, your Florida Bar standing, any clerkship bonus structures, any lateral guarantee package documentation if recent firm move, and any S-corp or LLC election if boutique partner — then we tell you whether Conventional Conforming W-2, Conventional Jumbo W-2, Conventional Jumbo K-1, S-Corp Self-Employed, Schedule C + Form 1084, Asset-Depletion Non-QM, or in-house counsel multi-source aggregation fits best. If we’re not the right shop, we’ll tell you that too.

Jim Blackburn NMLS #1072866 · Stairway Mortgage

An 8-ebook journey · from 18 to legacy

Download The Stairway Roadmap.

Map your real estate journey from age 18 through legacy — one ebook for every chapter. Free.